Search our Site


Home
About IDRA
Research
IDRA Newsletter
Education Policy
Press Room
IDRA News Sign Up
Newsletter Plus Login
Contact Us
Publications
Events
Laredo Early Childhood
Education Summit
Available Podcasts
Classnotes Podcast
Syndicate
RSS
Download our podcasts
directly to your Ipod


or listen directly by clicking here


Thursday, 28 August 2008

ALL |0-9 |A |B |C |D |E |F |G |H |I |J |K |L |M |N |O |P |Q |R |S |T |U |V |W |X |Y |Z


Equity in School Funding Print E-mail

Will the Supreme Court decision impact the recapture system?
The Supreme Court did not rule that recapture is unconstitutional. To the contrary, the justices pointed to evidence to show how recapture caused the school finance system to be more efficient (that is, equitable) than it previously was. Under the current system, the 100 districts with the most property wealth send some revenue to the state, while more than 900 districts receive additional money.

However, according to the Supreme Court, there is still a 40 percent difference between the richest and the poorest districts. If anything, more recapture is needed, not less.

Remember, the benefits of recapture are not limited to “poor districts.” Nearly 90 percent of districts receive money from recapture. These include many average wealth rural and suburban school systems. If recapture is eliminated, everyone in these 900 communities will pay higher taxes to make up any cuts in recapture money.

See other questions and answers about the ruling and related issues

 
< Prev   Next >
Education Topics in this Web Site
How useful is this web site to you?
 
 © Intercultural Development Research Association  ·  5815 Callaghan Road, Suite 101 ·  San Antonio,Texas 78228
Phone: 210-444-1710  ·   Fax: 210-444-1714