IDRA Policy Issues for Texas in 2019
See PDF version (with resource links)
Fair Funding that Ensures Equity and Excellence for All Students
IDRA Stands
- All state and local aid made available for public schools should be funded through equalized formulas.
- Efforts to reduce recapture must be done equitably.
- State aid for students served in bilingual education or compensatory education programs should be increased to 40% of regular program costs.
Why?
The quality of children’s education should not be determined by the neighborhood where they happen to live. In the context of global competition, excellent schools are needed for all students – not good schools for a few and mediocre ones for the rest. The research is clear: educational resources matter, especially for low-income and English learner (EL) students. Research indicates that compensatory education and EL education costs in Texas average about 40 percent over regular program costs. However, over 35 years ago, the state set funding far below recommended levels for those students, and those funding formulas remain unchanged.
See…
- IDRA’s Texas School Finance news dashboard New!
- IDRA’s Fair Funding for the Common Good website
- Testimony: Equity and Meaningful Educational Opportunity for All
- Letter: Education Groups Push State Leaders to Invest in High-Quality Public Education for All Children
- Statement: Fair Funding is Nonnegotiable – Texas Must Have Excellent Schools for All
- In School Finance Decision, the Poor People Have Lost Again
- Podcast: Key Issues in the Texas School Funding Trial
- IDRA’s initiative, Fair Funding Now! for Texas Education
- Low Funding for Educating ELLs Affects Students Across Texas – Symposium Proceedings
- IDRA’s English Language Learner Education website
- Principles for Fair Funding for the Common Good
Fair Discipline that Keeps Children in Safe Schools
IDRA Stands
- Ensure school safety and foster positive school climates by providing critical funds and supporting research-based programs and school-based professionals, like counselors and social workers.
- Eliminate harmful, unnecessary exclusionary discipline and policing practices inside schools.
- Make sure the same high-quality curriculum is available in all schools to all students, including those removed from their regular classrooms.
Why?
In Texas, students of color, boys, and students with disabilities are much more likely than their peers to be punished in school and have interactions with school police. In 2017-18, Black Texas students were suspended over four times more than their White classmates, even though Black students are not more likely to misbehave.
Pushing students out of the classroom results in missed learning time and an increased likelihood of justice system involvement. Punitive discipline practices also compromise student success and campus safety. To improve student outcomes and make schools safer, the state must ensure access to research-based school climate programs, provide training opportunities for educators and other school personnel, and increase the number of school-based counseling and mental health professionals.
See…
- IDRA’s School Discipline Research website
- Joint Statement: Legislative Solutions for Safe Schools Must Include School-Based Strategies that Help Educators and Support Students New!
- Study: Zero Tolerance Policies Push Students Away
- Data Story: Zero Tolerance Policies in Texas Push Black Students and Hispanic Students Away from School
- Data Story: School Policies and Practices Impact High School Attrition Rates in Bexar County
- Article: Partnerships, Not Push Outs – Collaboration is Critical to Dealing with Disparities
- Article: In-Grade Retention in the Early Years – What’s Holding Children Back?
- Policy Update: Disciplinary Alternative Education Programs in Texas – A 2009 Update
- National Clearinghouse on Supportive School Discipline
- eBook: Resources on Student Discipline Policy and Practice
Policies that Keep the Public in Public Education
IDRA Stands
- Public money must have public oversight and must not be diverted to private interests.
- There must be no further expansion of charter schools and limited public funds for facilities should not be siphoned off for charter schools.
Why?
The best way to strengthen public schools is to strengthen public schools. Diverting public money for private schools and subsidies for the rich takes money away from our communities resulting in higher taxes for homeowners and businesses. More importantly, private school vouchers, education savings accounts (ESAs), charter schools and related schemes further segregate students and do not result in improved learning.
See…
- IDRA’s Keeping the Public in Public Schools website
- Joint Letter to: TEA Regarding Implementation of the Common Charter Application and Charter Waiting List
- Joint statement: Increase the Transparency and Efficiency of Charter Schools in Texas, New!
- Testimony: Texas Needs to Keep Its Eye on the Ball – Keep the Public in Public Schools
- Study: Texas Charter School System Suffers Low Graduation Rates
- Infographic: Charter School Study – Pomp and Poor Circumstances
- Testimony: The State of Texas Open-Enrollment Charter Schools and a Modest Proposal to Diversify and Improve Public Charter Schools
- Statement: Vouchers: Unwise, Unworkable & Unfair
- IDRA Policy Brief: Why More Charter Schools and School Vouchers Are Not Needed in Texas
- Statement: HB5 Does Not Have to Block Students from College
- IDRA Factsheet Keep the Public in Public Education
Effective Accountability that Puts Children First and Supports Schools
IDRA Stands
- The state’s accountability system should be supportive, moving away from rigid, punitive structures.
- The state should collect some valid testing data and other performance measures to enable it to hold schools accountable for student achievement with data disaggregated by sub-groups.
- School accountability should be achieved by sample testing, saving millions of state tax dollars and simultaneously reducing the misuse of tests.
- The state accountability system must contain “opportunity-to-learn metrics,” including resource allocation, college preparation and teacher quality.
Why?
We must make sure our schools are doing an excellent job with all students, and disaggregated data helps us know where to focus improvement efforts. Sample testing makes it unnecessary to test all students to ensure schools produce good results and can prevent misuse of testing data in holding students back or preventing them from graduating. The federal Every Student Succeeds Act also gives Texas a chance to focus on improving struggling schools through asset-based approaches rather than punishing them.
Texas should drop its A-F accountability grading system and avoid the creation of a state- or privately-controlled “opportunity school district” that strips local control from communities. Instead, the state should add opportunity-to-learn metrics as part of its accountability system, which will allow the state to focus its resources on areas of need, thereby increasing the efficiency of the system.
See…
- Statement 2019: Reported STAAR Design Flaws in Reading Show Why High-stakes Punishments Should be Removed from the STAAR New!
- Policy Brief 2019: Don’t Block Graduation Because of a Test New!
- Infographic 2019: Use of Individual Graduation Committees Unlocks Diplomas for 14,422 Qualified Students in Texas New!
- Article 2018: In-grade Retention National Trends and Civil Rights Concerns
- eBook: Failing In-Grade Retention
- Failing Our Children – Finding Alternatives to In-Grade Retention
- News Release 2017: Texas’ temporary policy relieved high-stakes for 6,000 students
- Infographic 2017: Use of Individual Graduation Committees Unlocks Diplomas for Qualified Students
- Article 2016: In-Grade Retention in the Early Years – What’s Holding Children Back?
- Article 2001: Use of Tests When Making High-Stakes Decisions for Students
- IDRA’s Accountability website
- Article 2010: Accountability that Doesn’t Hurt Students
- Factsheet on Accountability that Doesn’t Hurt Students
Testing that Doesn’t Hurt Children
IDRA Stands
- No single measure should be used to make high-stakes decisions for promotion or graduation.
- The state should continue to graduate students who prove their well-rounded academic qualifications to independent graduation committees (IGCs).
Why?
Reliance on a single measure fails to consider factors that impact student achievement, including the fact that students have no control over inequitable school resources or the quality of teaching they receive. More importantly, the use of a single test score ignores other academic achievements, including grades, projects, college readiness measures and teacher recommendations. IGCs remain a viable option.
See…
- Statement 2019: Reported STAAR Design Flaws in Reading Show Why High-stakes Punishments Should be Removed from the STAAR
- Policy Brief 2019: Don’t Block Graduation Because of a Test
- Infographic 2019: Use of Individual Graduation Committees Unlocks Diplomas for 14,422 Qualified Students in Texas
- News Release 2017: Texas’ temporary policy relieved high-stakes for 6,000 students
- Infographic 2017: Use of Individual Graduation Committees Unlocks Diplomas for Qualified Students
- Article: In-Grade Retention in the Early Years – What’s Holding Children Back?
- Article: Use of Tests When Making High-Stakes Decisions for Students
- IDRA’s Accountability website
- Article: Accountability that Doesn’t Hurt Students
- Factsheet on Accountability that Doesn’t Hurt Students
Instruction for English Learners that Ensures Success
IDRA Stands
- Laws requiring bilingual education programs in elementary schools must remain, and exceptions must be strongly discouraged. And ELs in secondary schools must have access to teachers who are trained in EL instruction.
- The state should modify its procedures for monitoring EL performance by disaggregating EL performance data for each level of schooling.
- New immigrant students, including refugees, equally deserve a high-quality education.
Why?
With their potential for bilingualism, EL students are a great asset that should be nurtured. Research shows that bilingual and dual language education programs are highly effective in helping EL students learn English while also learning their core subjects. Texas must ensure these programs are properly supported and implemented. But middle and high school EL students, many of whom only get 45-minute ESL classes each day, do poorly on several metrics. That under-achievement is masked by the current practice of data reporting that lumps EL student performance across all grade levels. The state must monitor EL performance by school-level data instead, and it must vastly improve its efforts to support schools identified for intervention. Additionally, the state must ensure access to a strong public education for students, including new immigrant and refugee students, who may require more intensive, comprehensive services.
See…
- IDRA’s English Language Learner Education website
- Testimony: Without Increased Resources for English Learners, Texas Compromises Education for One-fifth of Students, February 13, 2019, New!
- Testimony: Texas Must Seize the Opportunity to Improve the Education for English Language Learners, Testimony of IDRA on English Language Learners
- Podcast: English Learners and the New ESSA Law
- Policy Update: Education of English Language Learners in U.S. and Texas Schools – Where We Are, What We Have Learned and Where We Need to Go from Here
- IDRA’s Framework for Effective Instruction of Secondary English Language Learners
Higher Education Access that Expands Opportunities
IDRA Stands
- Texas’ high school curriculum should prepare all students for college with high-quality, rigorous courses.
- Students should not be tracked into low-level courses nor into different diploma routes or graduation plans.
- In-state tuition rates for all Texas students, including undocumented immigrant students, must remain.
- Funding for need-based financial aid, including the Texas Grant Program, must be increased.
- College tuition must be re-regulated, but state aid also must increase to help fill the void.
- Texas should not make changes to its Top 10 Percent Plan.
Why?
Schools should not make pre-college decisions on behalf of students or track them into low-level courses that limit career options, and 14-year-olds should not be forced to make choices that will impact them the rest of their lives. High schools must ensure all students receive a rigorous course of study that prepares them for college. Research on the 21st century workforce indicates most jobs will require some level of education beyond high school. Employers need employees who are life-long learners prepared to adapt to a rapidly changing workplace. Models based on preparing one group for college and a second for immediate work are outmoded.
Re-regulation of high tuition rates is desperately needed, but the state should adequately support the state’s colleges and students needing assistance. In-state tuition rates for immigrant students and the Top 10 Percent Plan have increased the diversity of students applying for and enrolling in Texas universities and increased the number of high schools sending students to Texas’ top schools.
See…
- Analysis: Texas Top Ten Percent Plan at UT-Austin Has Dramatic Impact Within Texas Senate Districts New!
- Research: Texas High Schools Lost 1 in 5 Students Last Year – IDRA attrition study New!
- Research: Poor Children Are More Likely to Disappear from Schools in Texas New!
- College Bound and Determined– A report profiling what happens when a school district raises expectations for students instead of lowering them
- IDRA’s Access to College website
- Policy solutions for Latino Access to College
- IDRA’s book, Courage to Connect: A Quality Schools Action Framework™
- Article: “Of Course the Top Ten Percent is Constitutional… And It’s Pretty Good Policy Too,” Texas Hispanic Journal of Law and Policy(print form only)
- Top Ten Percent Plan in Texas resources
- Expecting Less is Not Betterbilingual statement
- Statement: HB5 Does Not Have to Block Students from College
The issues identified above highlight priorities for the upcoming session but readers should know that IDRA works with its partners in many other important areas, including early childhood, school discipline, bullying, multicultural education, school integration, teacher and teaching quality, and sex/gender equity.
The Intercultural Development Research Association is an independent, non-profit organization whose mission is to achieve equal educational opportunity for every child through strong public schools that prepare all students to access and succeed in college. For over 46 years, IDRA has strengthened and transformed public education by providing dynamic training; useful research, evaluation, and frameworks for action; timely policy analyses; and innovative materials and programs.
For more questions, please contact our National Director of Policy, Morgan Craven, J.D., at morgan.craven@idra.org.